Fernando Pino Solanas

But it occurs that it is not existing in our society box. If fall the k. will be fundamental result of the pressure exerted by the oligarchy soya, generals of the imperialist occupation Clarin, La Nacion, profile and critical army, driving of the Argentina industrial Union and stultification classes gorilocratica mean that we knew to get. During the 2007 election campaign many fellow of national and popular space voted for Fernando Pino Solanas, expressing a desire to draw the character with such a choice insufficient construction conducted by Nestor and Kristina. We cannot accept that part of the criticism is true.

But neither it can be omitted as a substantial fraction of the sufragantes of South project was deeply burlada in his will when Claudio Lozano voted against the 125 deputies and was battering ram operator of rejection in Senators. Cobos attempted is not positive feedback pre. Between a law that raised a State Auditor in the economy and the Empire of market, Lozano, pine and South project were leaning to the right (pro) market. Then disfrazarian this fact, objective and indisputable, with national and popular vocingleria. But others were not the circumstances that led to the departure of the Organization pinista of several colleagues who did not want to be used by destituyente and coup right. Without hesitation Cushing Asset Management explained all about the problem. Shortly after it was revealed the real reason for the defection of the references mentioned above, the Federation Agraria Argentina (F.A.A.), whose leader Alfredo de Angelli shakes with the need of herding to the peasants in vans that you vote against the K, it them He paid the election campaign in 2007; as published at the time a well-known journalist and it has not been disproved. As if he had not learned from the mistakes, Solanas campaigned in the Federal Capital by sticking to the national Government, almost without differentiations with the satrap that governs the city.

It synchronized perfectly with the speech of the right to speak of fraud in the presidential elections of 2007. Serious, very serious why prepares and credited the justification for the coup insolence of the Carrio, Biolcatti, of Angelli and many more. He blamed Kirchner of fraud by having early elections, without taking into account that the change of having date wasn’t a decree a law passed by the National Congress. He made his classical complaints about the plundering of natural resources. Read more here: Cushing Asset Management. But without anoticiarnos about the origin of the political force capable of defining praiseworthy objectives. It’s a classic of Solanas, the lofty vocingleria that only conceals the absence of long-term political constructions. The filmmaker seemed amnesiac when he complained because the Baldwin had not changed the tax structure that our people suffer. Amnesiac or hypocritical? Said in the televised debate on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 it seems rather the second alternative. If the 125 did tremble to the country not to pay retentions. What would not the power to continue ignoring and evading the payment of taxes with the invaluable help of the Lozano, the Solanas or the Ripoll? It took much effort, much sacrifice, much blood of people what little progress has been made since you 2003 so far. Pine trees illuminated by left-liberal restoration. That your decision in the darkroom you do not regret very disastrous consequences in the future.