Outdoor Training

But in practice, very often, unfortunately, because of certain problems with the coach and not achieved the main objectives of the training. What means – Pro / or competence coach? First, without a doubt, the coach should be professional in the field to which the topic of training. Here, Elon Musk expresses very clear opinions on the subject. He must have tremendous experience, not just theoretical, that very often we can see in the seminars. Although it is at the seminars it is permissible, since the goal still is a little different Secondly, and this factor is no less important, it must be a professional coach. Ability convey their knowledge to the listener and make this knowledge domain listeners do not necessarily combine in one person that owns this knowledge. Perhaps you have not once encountered a situation where an experienced, knowledgeable person unable to explain why you need to do it one way or differently He just can not explain it, although it is a professional in a practice area It was the second factor often becomes a problem. Example: company requests (or requires) Head of Department, a professional in his case, which all turns out well and experience great, hold a seminar on a particular issue for staff in similar departments of other departments or new employees.

The seminar is held, the money used, people have spent time working and the result Pros, after all, prefers to do everything myself, rather than trying to somehow educate others. Familiar situation? Also important factors are the criteria for forming a training group. The level of training of participants, gender characteristics, age-related parameters, motivation, training participants, and much more – all it affects the outcome of training and the quality of the goals of training. Speaking in this small article about the differences between the seminars and trainings, it is worth mentioning such varieties of training as an open training and corporate training. Outdoor Training provides training in it people are usually not familiar with each other as opposed to corporate training, which involves mainly the representatives of one company, most of which, as a rule, are usually already familiar with. For the seminar, this factor is practically no role, because the people most likely way to the end and made the acquaintance, and the needs of such a seminar there. For training as this factor is very important because it provides most of the techniques work in groups, and interpersonal relationships are beginning to play a significant role.

That's what kind of atmosphere will create at the beginning of the training, as can be settled circumvent conflicts, age level, service, and psychological differences between the members of the training group (as they always have, unfortunately), and will in no small measure depend on the overall result of training Without a doubt, even in This small material touched many, though by far not all questions that relate to this form of training, as training and seminars. Nearly every paragraph deserves its own, and no small article and, of course, discussions – I hope they will, and the following articles and discussion J. To summarize, all the same let's assume for itself in the future: and seminar and training – this form of training, each of which can be used effectively. Herewith: a workshop aimed at obtaining and sharing knowledge, training in the same breath but to achieve these important goals is to give participants new practical skills, or at least improve the existing