At this point of the film, one no longer puts the hand in the fire by no politician. Felipe Gonzlez by Blond Mariano did at the time and they already see: almost nothing else to make it the ex- governor of the bank of Spain went to stop to the jail. So are to touch themselves very much the clothes before exonerating the politicians, they are of the sign who will be. However, it seems to me iniquitous the one that tertulianos and analysts whom never they have questioned the attitude of Francisco Camps by the Grtel case now lies down like panthers on the fresh meat of Angel Moon. It is that the possible responsibility of one exculpates the one of the other? There are different twigs to measure according to which it is the militancy of each politician put in prohibition? Of entrance, the imputation of a possible fraud perpetrated in the exercise of its public activity, as it is the case, for example, of the accusation maintained against Carlos Fabra is not the same, that the irregular or ugly activity where is until now the illicit penitentiary of its action? realised in its work deprived by Angel Moon or by any other. Clear that any gift, forgiving, payment or similar done by an industralist can submit the future task of which returns to the policy or can have it conditional in the past, when acted like politician. All this is possible, by all means, but before it must be tried. Meanwhile, to ask that resignsof what, being a mere and impotent deputy of the opposition? as parliamentary spokesman of his party sounds to sarcasm. He is as if all the political commentators who have received some Christmas flattery of the Catalan Autonomous Government practically the totality of credited in the Corts could not exert for that reason like parliamentary critics.