Using a mobile phone as a navigation device while driving is a violation of 23 paragraph 1a StVO dar. Listen to music, communicate, take pictures and surf the World Wide Web. All this and much more is possible with the modern mobile phones. Many can be used as a navigation device. Ideal if you are on the road and has no fixed device. However here is the same as for the use of mobile phones at the wheel. Using a mobile phone as a navigation device while driving is a violation of 23 paragraph 1a StVO dar. The result: a misdemeanor, which is punishable by a fine.

Alexander Dobiasch and Rupert Richter from Bergen auf Rugen, the lawyers informed the decision of the OLG Hamm. Hands his car driver must free are allowed to use any mobile phones at the wheel. This is known. A current case according to the ban but also refers to the use of the mobile phone as a navigation device. A motorist has been observed at the wheel, as he one Setting the phone made, in order to use it as a navigation.

The police patrol stopped him and announced a fine of 40 euros. Both hands must be free while driving, to properly operate the vehicle. The driver did not agree with the penalty. Wrongly, as noted by the OLG Hamm. “The objection of the driver: the fine provision covers not the use of the mobile phone as a navigation aid” was not considered so. Retrieving data for the navigation be classified using the mobile phone, not allowed and thus is a misdemeanor, which is punishable by a fine. For detailed information about all services Alexander Dobiasch and Rupert Richter from Bergen, the lawyers are on Rugen anytime available. Press contact contact: lawyers Alexander Dobiasch & Rupert Richter Marktstrasse 8 18528 Bergen auf Rugen phone: + 49 03838 / 25 71 10 fax: + 49 03838 / 25 71 15 E-Mail: website:

Federal Supreme Court

After all, it was as a result of this finding Insurance contract law on the part of the legislator’s changed! And if the legislature so respond, should also be clear how the Court will decide. And it is also clear that the insurer will voluntarily make to collect just no judgment of the Court of Justice – with far-reaching consequences – about. The BGH’s opinion shows that the Federal Supreme Court judges are subject to influences from third parties and the lobbying efforts of the insurance industry is strong, according to estimates by the free Advisor in December 2010. Clear must be that this opinion is irrelevant. Only the Court can make a decision on this issue, the free advisors has announced that always. All this has not encourages the LV doctor finally before the ECJ. The free Adviser condemned this step.

Because no economic interest in a competitor can outweigh the interests of general consumers. Read more here: Neutrona Wand. It is imperative to clarify the facts before a court not German. After all, millions. Pity that the customers of LV doctor still sit in the corner and freely exercise these. In addition sleeps here a whole Brokership, which has made big promises its customers, now however, where action would be required, remains passive. The free consultant had informed there has been a request on the part of LV doctor, to cooperate with us as Prozesskostenfinanzierer. The free Advisor because not reasonable claims broke off the negotiations. Also must leave ask LV doctor, how on the one hand for years contract calls for charges, which are to be used, on the other hand brings but not the individual cases to complain to complain as cost-sharing. Summarizes the free Advisor: customers pay funds, which at least does not apply according to the contractual statements made. Considering now in addition that there are periods of limitation according to some experts from termination, many customers lose their claims, if not on time will be charged.

PAN High

It is a product highly toxic. Since 1985, the PAN network deploys a campaign to disseminate the dangers of further use of the 12 most toxic pesticides, the so-called dirty dozen, which seeks the prohibition of such substances. In 2002 started a specific campaign for this pesticide, STOP Paraquat, which conditioned the ban or use restricted in 13 countries, 4 of whom were members of the EU. Despite all, the EU has given a boost to this pesticide in late 2003. As is the case with the majority of authorisations of GMOs, the decision was very controversial and counter argumentation of Sweden, with the support of Finland, Luxembourg and Denmark was not taken into account.

Authorization requires some precautions for protection of operators, costly economically and impossible to meet in case of high temperatures and an annual assessment of damage on workers and the terrestrial fauna in the areas where they apply. I.e., it recognizes the danger, but rather than avoid it, applying the precautionary principle, accepts the conditions of the company (Sygenta) and subordinates trabajador@s and environmental health protection to the economic interests of the agrochemical industry. In addition, the authorization in the EU has neutralized the positive effects of awareness-raising campaigns, slowing the process of ban of paraquat in countries of the South, despite the impossibility of adopting the levels of protection of the workers of the rich countries. It is very serious when it is said, that the EU is not applying the precautionary principle to protect people and the environment from the negative effects of pesticides. Its review program, again deferred, is a mask to continue to act for the benefit of the chemical industry.

All the most dangerous substances are not prohibited and whose damage have been tested. I do not know suspended those on which there are studies that indicate their dangerousness, although not reach scientific significance, until they demonstrate their harmlessness, as it should be done in the exercise of the precautionary principle. The prohibitions are sometimes drills because they still use in the form of essential uses. Since 1992 has been requested the inclusion of a hundred of new pesticides that come to relieve to the previous ones and, according to the European Environment Agency, are more toxic, although more specific and more effective (until new resistance of pests reduce their effectiveness) very significant opinion that EU, seconded by Governments, diminish the importance to contamination by pesticides that contain foodDespite making regular checks. Of every 100 vegetables that consumes European citizen, 60 are completely clean of pesticides, 36 have remains below the maximum tolerated dose and 4 are contaminated above of these doses. 40% Contain remains and Although they are mostly below the authorized limits, they begin to accumulate evidence that small doses for a long time can be more harmful than high doses at once. In turn, a balanced diet, with high consumption of fruits, vegetables and cereals, contain pesticide levels exceeding those recommended according to a study carried out in Barcelona through thousand samples collected in the shops share the Group’s valuable position when verbatim indicates, that pest control is not reducible to chemistry problem because it is agro-ecological. Pests and diseases are the result of unbalanced agrosystems. The use of large amounts of broad-spectrum pesticides just failing and creating new problems. The best way to control pests is to recover the balance of the agrosystem and the maintenance of biodiversity. * Source: Environment and society, year 9, no.


Here however, the housekeepers are employed in the household of the taxpayer as part-time employees or in employment subject to social insurance contributions. Handyman services expenses for craft activities are promoted through a further tax reduction. Favors are not only cosmetic repairs and repairs, but also renovation, conservation and Modernization measures. All handyman services, carried out in an even used apartment are favored. It does not matter, whether it is occupied as tenant or owner.

Also work on the common-ownership are favored property owners. Homeowners should make sure therefore that the tax-advantaged craftsmen work in the annual statement of accounts are listed separately and also the individual share of the co-ownership is certified. beneficiaries are not favored, painting of doors, Windows, radiators are renovating the apartment materials such as tiles, wallpaper, paints, floor covering, etc., Repairs and replacement of doors, Windows or floor documents new buildings and extensions of the area work on Interior and exterior walls, roof, facade, garage handyman services for other public funding beanspruchtwurden modernization of the bathroom or replacing the kitchen reading, payroll and rent of electricity, gas, water meters repair by Household appliances (washing machine, oven, TV) in the household of the taxable repairs of motor vehicles repair, maintenance or replacement of heating systems as well as electrical, gas or plumbing by KfW Forderbank or CO2 building rehabilitation programme funded contractor costs only wages and labour costs are favored Haushaltsnahe employment to the beneficiaries costs include gross wages and social security contributions borne by the employer, as well as the flat-rate income tax for mini-jobs. Household services, contractor costs a tax reduction is granted only for the labour costs. These include travel expenses, also machines and the related sales tax. Material costs (E.g., colors, wallpaper) and expenses for goods are not favored, however.

Only expenses for consumables such as E.g. detergent are harmless. Pro rata labour costs need be out separately in the invoice. Promotion Haushaltsnahe is carried out only upon presentation of the necessary evidence employment relationships of minor jobs the certificates issued by the mini-job headquarters serve as proof. For other employment wage documents and post evidence can be submitted via the transfer of social security contributions. Household services, contractor costs only who shall submit a proper accounts for household services and contractor costs and with a bank statement, a transfer document or an electronic cash receipt indicating the non-cash payment will enjoy of a tax reduction. The tax bonus can only once granted also every household in shared flats living in a common household taxpayers that claim rebates only once. Torsten Bogausch Schmidt & Partner GmbH Steuerberatungsgesellschaft branch Weisswasser of Bautzner Strasse 38 02943 Weisswasser Tel.: 03576/2839-0 fax: 03576 / 283930 Internet: sp Weisswasser E-mail: